Difference between revisions of "Talk:Food Management"
From SPNHC Wiki
(Created page with "== List of text changes == * Changed in Statement of Purpose section the following sentence: "This document aims to provide guidelines to support staff in developing and impro...") |
(added discussion about placement of contributors section) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* Changed in Statement of Purpose section the following sentence: "This document aims to provide guidelines to support staff in developing and improving institutional policies and procedures for effective food management. This document is available through the SPNHC website and will be reviewed periodically." to align with the presence of the text on this platform. --[[User:RachaelArenstein|RachaelArenstein]] ([[User talk:RachaelArenstein|talk]]) 10:50, 25 September 2015 (CEST) | * Changed in Statement of Purpose section the following sentence: "This document aims to provide guidelines to support staff in developing and improving institutional policies and procedures for effective food management. This document is available through the SPNHC website and will be reviewed periodically." to align with the presence of the text on this platform. --[[User:RachaelArenstein|RachaelArenstein]] ([[User talk:RachaelArenstein|talk]]) 10:50, 25 September 2015 (CEST) | ||
* Embedded the case studies rather than separating them into their own section or as a separate document (i.e. appedix). Correspondingly, removed in text references to Appendices. --[[User:RachaelArenstein|RachaelArenstein]] ([[User talk:RachaelArenstein|talk]]) 10:50, 25 September 2015 (CEST) | * Embedded the case studies rather than separating them into their own section or as a separate document (i.e. appedix). Correspondingly, removed in text references to Appendices. --[[User:RachaelArenstein|RachaelArenstein]] ([[User talk:RachaelArenstein|talk]]) 10:50, 25 September 2015 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Things to consider == | ||
| + | I added a contributors section down at the bottom (and linked to your user pages as incentive to fill in information there!). This could be moved up to the top. It would be nice for this to be standardized across pages. Putting it at top might be incentive to participation but if most of these are group or committee projects maybe it detracts from the community aspect? Not sure. AIC puts it at the top of the page. --[[User:RachaelArenstein|RachaelArenstein]] ([[User talk:RachaelArenstein|talk]]) 14:05, 25 September 2015 (CEST) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:05, 25 September 2015
List of text changes
- Changed in Statement of Purpose section the following sentence: "This document aims to provide guidelines to support staff in developing and improving institutional policies and procedures for effective food management. This document is available through the SPNHC website and will be reviewed periodically." to align with the presence of the text on this platform. --RachaelArenstein (talk) 10:50, 25 September 2015 (CEST)
- Embedded the case studies rather than separating them into their own section or as a separate document (i.e. appedix). Correspondingly, removed in text references to Appendices. --RachaelArenstein (talk) 10:50, 25 September 2015 (CEST)
Things to consider
I added a contributors section down at the bottom (and linked to your user pages as incentive to fill in information there!). This could be moved up to the top. It would be nice for this to be standardized across pages. Putting it at top might be incentive to participation but if most of these are group or committee projects maybe it detracts from the community aspect? Not sure. AIC puts it at the top of the page. --RachaelArenstein (talk) 14:05, 25 September 2015 (CEST)
